Why Most Communication Training Fails (And What Actually Works in Australian Workplaces)

Connect with us: SB Nation | Medium | Elephant Journal | The Old Reader | Scholastica

Three months ago, I watched a $50,000 communication training program implode spectacularly at a Brisbane manufacturing company. The external consultant—flown in from somewhere fancy—spent two days teaching PowerPoint slides about "active listening" and "empathetic responses" to a room full of tradies who'd rather stick their heads in machinery than role-play feelings with Karen from HR.

By week three, nothing had changed. Actually, that's a lie—things got worse. People were using the training buzzwords sarcastically, and the workshop became an inside joke. The real kicker? Management blamed the workers for "not engaging with the process."

Here's what nobody wants to admit: most workplace communication training is absolutely useless because it ignores how Australians actually communicate.

The Fundamental Problem With Generic Training

After 18 years running communication workshops across Australia, I've seen every flavour of corporate nonsense imaginable. The biggest mistake companies make is buying off-the-shelf programs designed for American corporate environments and expecting them to work in Aussie workplaces.

We don't do feelings-circles. We don't start meetings with trust falls. And we sure as hell don't appreciate being told to "leverage synergistic communication paradigms" when what we really need is to stop Steve from interrupting every bloody meeting.

The most effective communication training I've delivered always starts with one simple truth: Australians communicate differently, and that's not a problem to fix—it's a strength to harness.

What Actually Works: The Three-Layer Approach

Layer One: Fix the Obvious Stuff First

Before you even think about advanced communication techniques, sort out the basics. This means dealing with:

• People who dominate meetings (usually 2-3 individuals)
• Email chains that go nowhere
• The person who says "yes" to everything then delivers nothing
• Meeting overload that leaves no time for actual work

I once worked with a Perth engineering firm where 73% of staff complained about poor communication. Turns out, they were having 43 meetings per week across a 12-person team. The solution wasn't better listening skills—it was fewer bloody meetings.

Layer Two: Teach Practical Tools, Not Theory

Forget the communication models with fancy names. Focus on techniques people can use immediately:

The "Email Test": If your email is longer than your phone screen, pick up the phone instead. Revolutionary concept, I know.

The "Two-Question Rule": Before sending any message, ask yourself: "What do I need?" and "When do I need it?" If you can't answer both clearly, don't send anything.

The "Meeting MVP Method": Every meeting needs a Most Valuable Point. If you can't identify it in the first five minutes, you're in the wrong meeting.

These aren't groundbreaking concepts, but they work because they're simple and immediately applicable.

Layer Three: Address Australian Communication Culture

This is where most training falls apart. We need to acknowledge that Australian workplace communication includes:

• Directness that Americans might consider rude
• Humour as a conflict-resolution tool
• Informal hierarchies that don't match org charts
• Skepticism towards corporate-speak

The best communication skills training I've seen works with these cultural traits, not against them.

The Email Problem Nobody Talks About

Let's be honest about email for a minute. The average Australian office worker sends 87 emails per day and receives 124. That's insane. But instead of teaching people to write better emails, most training focuses on touchy-feely stuff like "tone" and "emotional intelligence."

Here's what I tell people: Stop trying to be polite in emails. Start being clear.

"I hope this email finds you well" is a waste of everyone's time. So is "Please let me know if you have any questions." Just say what you need, when you need it, and who's responsible.

I worked with a Sydney law firm last year that cut their email volume by 40% simply by banning "Reply All" and requiring every email to have a clear action item in the subject line. No fancy training required.

The Meeting Epidemic

Meetings are where communication goes to die in most Australian workplaces. We've created a culture where people are afraid to make decisions without consulting everyone, so we schedule more meetings to discuss the meetings we had about the previous meetings.

This is madness.

The most successful teams I work with have embraced what I call "Meeting Minimalism." They assume every meeting is unnecessary until proven otherwise. They require written agendas 24 hours in advance. They end meetings early when the objective is achieved.

But here's the controversial bit: they also acknowledge that some of their best communication happens in the pub after work, not in Conference Room B.

Why Personality Tests Are Usually Bullshit

Don't get me started on DISC profiles and Myers-Briggs assessments being used as communication tools. I've seen companies spend thousands on these tests, then watch teams argue about whether someone is "really an ENFJ" instead of just telling Dave to stop monopolising the floor.

Personality frameworks can be useful for self-reflection, but they're terrible for solving workplace communication problems. You know what works better? Teaching people to ask, "What's the best way to communicate with you?" and actually listening to the answer.

I remember working with a Melbourne accounting firm where the partners were convinced their junior staff were "poor communicators" because they didn't speak up in meetings. Turns out, the juniors had plenty to contribute—they just preferred to share ideas via Slack rather than interrupt senior partners mid-flow.

Once we established multiple communication channels instead of forcing everyone into the same meeting-room format, productivity jumped 30%.

The Technology Factor

Everyone talks about digital communication tools, but most companies implement them badly. They add Slack, then wonder why people still send emails. They introduce project management software, then continue managing projects via WhatsApp.

The issue isn't the technology—it's that nobody explains how different tools serve different purposes. Email for formal documentation. Slack for quick questions. Phone calls for complex discussions. Face-to-face for sensitive topics.

Seems obvious, right? But I've worked with teams who were trying to conduct performance reviews via emoji reactions.

What About Remote Communication?

The pandemic changed everything about workplace communication, and most training hasn't caught up. The old "open door policy" doesn't work when everyone's working from their kitchen table.

Remote communication requires different skills:

• Over-communicating context (because people can't read the room anymore)
• Being comfortable with asynchronous conversations
• Using video strategically (not for every bloody meeting)
• Creating deliberate social interaction opportunities

The companies adapting best aren't the ones with fancy video conferencing setups—they're the ones who've figured out how to maintain their culture through screens.

The ROI Question Everyone Avoids

Here's something training providers hate discussing: measuring the actual impact of communication training. Most programs rely on "satisfaction scores" and vague testimonials rather than concrete business outcomes.

But good communication training should deliver measurable results:

• Reduced project timelines
• Fewer customer complaints
• Lower staff turnover
• Increased sales (for customer-facing roles)

If your training provider can't explain how they'll measure success beyond "participants will feel more confident," find a different provider.

Getting Buy-In From Skeptical Teams

The hardest part of implementing communication training isn't the training itself—it's convincing people it's worth their time. Especially in industries where people pride themselves on "just getting stuff done" rather than talking about getting stuff done.

I've learned to lead with problems people actually experience:

"Tired of chasing the same people for updates every week?" "Sick of meetings that could've been emails?" "Want customers to stop asking for your manager?"

Frame it as problem-solving, not personal development, and you'll get much better engagement.

Industry-Specific Considerations

Communication training can't be one-size-fits-all because different industries have different communication norms. What works in a creative agency won't work on a construction site.

Manufacturing environments need clear, safety-focused communication protocols. Professional services need client-facing communication skills. Retail teams need conflict resolution techniques.

The effective communication training programs I've seen work best are tailored to industry context, not generic business environments.

The Cultural Dimension

Australian workplaces are increasingly multicultural, which adds another layer to communication challenges. But most training approaches this topic badly, focusing on stereotypes rather than individual preferences.

Better approach: create environments where people can express their communication preferences directly. Some cultures prioritise hierarchical communication. Others value direct feedback. Some prefer written instructions; others need verbal confirmation.

The goal isn't to eliminate these differences—it's to help teams navigate them effectively.

Implementation Reality Check

Here's the uncomfortable truth: even the best communication training won't fix fundamental organisational problems. If your company culture punishes honest feedback, no amount of "assertiveness training" will help. If senior management models poor communication behaviours, expecting junior staff to do better is delusional.

Communication training works best when it's part of broader cultural change, not a Band-Aid solution for deeper issues.

The Australian Advantage

Despite all the challenges, Australian workplaces have some significant communication advantages. We're generally less hierarchical than many cultures. We value directness over diplomatic language. We use humour to defuse tension.

These traits can be powerful communication tools when leveraged properly. The problem is that most training tries to suppress them rather than channel them effectively.

What's Next?

The future of workplace communication training needs to be more practical, more culturally aware, and more focused on measurable outcomes. It should acknowledge that good communication isn't about following scripts—it's about connecting with people in ways that actually work.

The companies getting this right aren't necessarily the ones with the biggest training budgets. They're the ones willing to experiment, measure results, and adapt their approach based on what actually works for their people.

Because at the end of the day, effective communication isn't about perfect technique—it's about getting stuff done while treating people decently. And most Australians are pretty good at that already.

We just need training that builds on our strengths instead of trying to turn us into something we're not.